Back to: Psychological Foundations of Education B.ed Notes, M.A Notes, IGNOU Notes and Graduation Notes

Guilford’s Structure of Intellect Model

J. P. Guilford, a psychologist, worked on exams to choose applicants for pilot training during World War II. He introduced a framework to direct his studies and to structure his thoughts about all the many talents he was evaluating as his concerns grew to include evaluating additional distinct thinking abilities.

Guilford is largely recognized for starting to examine creativity in psychology. He emphasized the significance of creativity as a study issue in his 1950 Presidential Address to the American Psychological Association (Guilford, 1987), as well as the rarity of documented studies on the subject. He believed that because people believed that innovation came naturally with IQ-measured intellect, they had not started to examine creativity.

Guilford offered his opinion on the subject and stated his plan to start separating the many components of reasoning in order to isolate creativity and other talents from the variables assessed by IQ. He also stated his aim to utilize a rigorous statistical method.

The Structure of Intellect Model

These many skills were arranged according to three aspects in his “Structure of Intellect” model: content, product, and process. In order to create assessments for every possible combination of the following aspects, he anticipated that an individual would be strong in some of these skills and weak in others.

He outlines the outcomes of his work and the updated paradigm that resulted through his investigation in “The nature of human intelligence (1967) and Way beyond the IQ (1977).”

Content:

He used the term “content” to describe how various individuals appeared to focus on and process different types of information more successfully, such as:

Visual: straight from perception or through picturing.

Auditory: Straight from the sensations or from pictures.
Symbolic: Phrases and symbolism often have some sort of symbolic value.
Semantic: Words are frequent but do not always have semantic meanings attached to them.

Behavioral: data on the emotions and actions of the people being watched.

These skills arose through his experimentation, and they were used to add this kind of material to the design. “Social intelligence,” which is a term that was popularized by Daniel Goleman in 1995,

Products:

The methods listed that extract from the content categories are related to the “products” aspect:

Units: The capacity to recognise units within a content area is referred to as units. These could be behavioral units like facial expressions, graphical components like forms or symbolic units like words.
Classes: It describes the aptitude for classifying objects into appropriate groupings and grouping them into meaningful groups.

Relations: Understanding the connections between similar units is what relations is all about.
Systems: These are made up of the connections between more than two elements.
Transformations: The capacity to comprehend informational alterations, such as the rotations of visual figures or gags and humor in the linguistic domain.

Implications: Expectation is referred to as “implications.” One could anticipate that some additional information would be accurate given a particular combination of facts.

Researchers can categorize all of the possible types of information using the two dimensions of content and product. People may discuss the meanings of a symbolic sequence, the connection between two consonants, or behavioral modifications like emotional alterations.

Process:

Whatever the mind does with and to various kinds of information is described by the “process” component:

Cognition: The capacity to comprehend the diverse elements is related to cognition. For example, the processing of conceptual components has to do with one’s vocabulary and capacity to recognise words. The capacity to notice variations in a person’s emotions would be referred to as cognition of behavioral shifts.
Memory: It is the capacity to retain and recall various types of information. Individuals differ in their capacity to memorize knowledge from a variety of sources, not just from one another . Sometimes people may have problems recalling appearances (behavioral units) yet do well with wordplay (semantic transformations).

Divergent production: The capacity to acquire information is relevant. It alludes to the capacity to locate several items that satisfy a few basic requirements. For example, the capacity to list a large number of pictures that contain a circle is a component of the capacity to construct visual components divergently. The capacity to rewrite tales about people would be one aspect of behavioral modifications that differ. The capacity to enumerate multiple solutions that might be inferred from provided equations would constitute a divergence in symbolic implications.
Convergent Production: It is the process of looking for a definite answer in one’s recollection to a query or circumstance. The majority of logic-type conflict resolution falls within this category. It differentiates from dispersion in that there can only be one correct response. Although it appears that achievement in convergent activities is really the outcome of divergent composition and assessment, it is a talent that is frequently assessed and is the one that is most frequently linked to IQ.
Evaluation: The capacity to judge whether sources of evidence are similar in some manner, which pieces are superior, and which attributes are common by different sets of data, is what it is.

Together, these three variables help to determine 150 distinct skill sets. It is crucial to keep in mind that this models were established as a reference for a data analysis study to examine the relationships between the different groups and the model’s capacity to accommodate test data.