Humans won’t go into great depth here because research philosophy is a large subject. The nature of the investigation, assumptions, and knowledge are all related to research philosophy. It addresses a certain method of information literacy. This issue has to be handled because various researchers may have several beliefs about the nature of knowledge and understanding, and philosophy enables us to comprehend these beliefs.
How can it be defined?
Research philosophy is a viewpoint on the methods that should be utilized to collect, evaluate, and apply data regarding a topic. In contrast to doxology, which refers to what has been thought to be accurate, the word “epistemology” refers to what is recognized to be accurate.
Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill state, “Research philosophy is classified as ontology, epistemology, and axiology. These philosophical approaches enable us to decide which approach should be adopted by the researcher and why, which is derived from research questions.”
The philosophical assumptions list the main preconceptions and give the researcher’s perspective. The study strategy and its methodology will be determined by these hypotheses.
Nature of Philosophical Research:
Research philosophy examines the origins, nature, and progression of information. Research philosophy is just an opinion on how information about phenomena must be gathered, evaluated, and applied.
Even if the influence on knowledge production can seem deep, you are involved in it while you work on your study. To respond to the particular research, you will gather secondary and primary data, perform analysis of data, and produce new information.
Assumptions regarding the collection and the construction of knowledge are used as the foundation for each stage of research. The key presuppositions will be reflected in the research philosophy, and they will also serve as the foundation for the proposed study. Broadly speaking, research methodology has various subfields relating to numerous academic fields. Four primary research theories fall under the umbrella of management studies in particular:
- Interpretivism (Interpretivist)
Practical ramifications influence which research philosophy is chosen. Research that concentrates on statistics and facts, including a study of the effect of foreign capital on the rate of GDP development, and qualitative research, such as an assessment of management on employee engagement in businesses, have major philosophical distinctions.
The decision between quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, including positivist and interpretivist research philosophies, has historically been a prominent topic of discussion. The appeal of pragmatic and realism ideologies has expanded as a result of recent advancements in study methodology.
Purpose of Philosophical Research
- Evaluate or combine previously acquired knowledge.
- Look at current circumstances or issues.
- Describe remedies for issues.
- Investigate and evaluate broad concerns.
- Build new systems or processes from scratch.
- Describe recent occurrences.
- Provide fresh information
Procedure of Philosophical Research
To successfully conduct a philosophical investigation, there are a few strictly delineated steps that must be taken into account.
- Finding topics: Finding relevant subjects to investigate is the first step in any philosophical investigation. At this point, it is crucial to take every precaution to guarantee that the central subject can provide a coherent system of reasoning. When choosing a subject for inquiry, having personal knowledge of the material that is already accessible is helpful.
- Data gathering: Considering the specified subject and the initial concerns within, the researcher must compile all relevant data to data pertinent to the topic from the body of literature already in circulation. This step is extremely important since the researcher will need to determine the data’s relevancy and the best technique to get it. One must be certain of the reliability of the data providers and the type of information they provide.
- Data analysis and understanding: The facts should be rationally divided into groups based on the topic of the inquiry. The information under each categorization must then be interpreted while bearing in mind the primary issues we outlined in that area. In the framework of the key issues undergoing review, perception may involve several procedures including presentation, contrast, assessment, cross-examination, etc. of various concepts and theories.
- Reporting the survey: Reporting the research may be used to identify the last phase of the activity. The contact occurs in a proper sequence between the various categorization categories, and suitable inferences are reached near the presentation’s climax. At this point, attention must be paid to presentational correctness and simplicity. Additionally, the presentation must thoroughly acknowledge any relevant references and quotes, as well as place focus on any pertinent points of the presentation.